The Next Apollo? Yeah right!
I recently listened to a Science Friday (NPR) podcast about innovation in American science. Their premise, in this episode, is that the United States is not sowing the seeds of innovation, by investing in basic scientific research, and is, instead, "icing the cake" that was baked 30 years ago.
The show's guest, Judy Estrin, claims that the internet couldn't have been invented without the work that was done decades earlier. While that's true (we do stand on the shoulders of giants), the way she talks about it makes it sound like someone planted a little seed labeled "Internet" 30 years ago, which then germinated at a later time. Purportedly, all we have done since then is just "icing". Well, how does she know?! How does she know that no research from the last ten years will germinate in 30 years? Lots of topics are researched, and few of those things are immediately and obviously useful (see, for example, Americium for smoke detectors). That's the point of basic research. I'm not debating its necessity; just that we don't always know what will bear fruit, including some of the "short-sighted frosting" of the last decade.
Among the solutions Estrin proposes for stimulating basic research and convincing the general public of its worth is that we need our generation's Sputnik and the equivalent Apollo program in response. Okay, superficially, that sounds good. Let's manufacture an international "crisis" and then spend billions of dollars to make sure we're ahead. Hmm, it seems that was tried earlier this decade... Seriously, though, if you're going to spend that money, you need a concrete and achievable goal that people are excited about. Estrin's idea: energy independence and a green revolution. Are you kidding me?!? These _are_ worthy goals, but they're NOT sexy! Getting a person in orbit? Definitely thrilling. Being the first people to walk on another celestial body? Certainly pulse-pounding. Moreover, these were tangible goals with a clear outcome (perhaps that was why the Apollo program decayed after the first few moonwalks?). And, finally, the Apollo program had the big, bad Soviets as villains thus keeping the all-important funds flowing. For Estrin's idea to work, someone needs to brand the green movement differently and give us a worthy opponent.
Edit: Loren pointed out the Crazy Green Idea competition. The Reduce Home Energy entry, by encouraging competition between communities, may provide a worthy opponent. The trick will be to make the goals tangible enough for everyone to buy into.
The show's guest, Judy Estrin, claims that the internet couldn't have been invented without the work that was done decades earlier. While that's true (we do stand on the shoulders of giants), the way she talks about it makes it sound like someone planted a little seed labeled "Internet" 30 years ago, which then germinated at a later time. Purportedly, all we have done since then is just "icing". Well, how does she know?! How does she know that no research from the last ten years will germinate in 30 years? Lots of topics are researched, and few of those things are immediately and obviously useful (see, for example, Americium for smoke detectors). That's the point of basic research. I'm not debating its necessity; just that we don't always know what will bear fruit, including some of the "short-sighted frosting" of the last decade.
Among the solutions Estrin proposes for stimulating basic research and convincing the general public of its worth is that we need our generation's Sputnik and the equivalent Apollo program in response. Okay, superficially, that sounds good. Let's manufacture an international "crisis" and then spend billions of dollars to make sure we're ahead. Hmm, it seems that was tried earlier this decade... Seriously, though, if you're going to spend that money, you need a concrete and achievable goal that people are excited about. Estrin's idea: energy independence and a green revolution. Are you kidding me?!? These _are_ worthy goals, but they're NOT sexy! Getting a person in orbit? Definitely thrilling. Being the first people to walk on another celestial body? Certainly pulse-pounding. Moreover, these were tangible goals with a clear outcome (perhaps that was why the Apollo program decayed after the first few moonwalks?). And, finally, the Apollo program had the big, bad Soviets as villains thus keeping the all-important funds flowing. For Estrin's idea to work, someone needs to brand the green movement differently and give us a worthy opponent.
Edit: Loren pointed out the Crazy Green Idea competition. The Reduce Home Energy entry, by encouraging competition between communities, may provide a worthy opponent. The trick will be to make the goals tangible enough for everyone to buy into.


